|
January 30, 2002 |
|
By Therese Poletti
January 24, 2002
San Jose Mercury News |
Tucked away in Hillsboro, Ore., a small team of Intel
engineers has been quietly working on a chip technology that
the giant semiconductor maker hopes will never see the light
of day. Intel's Yamhill Technology is a secret weapon
against upcoming chips from rival Advanced Micro Devices. It's
also a hedge against the possible failure of Intel's flashy
new Itanium chips for computer servers, which have so far
gotten a disappointing reception from customers and partners. |
|
By David Lammers
January 29, 2002
EE Times |
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. plans to acquire Alchemy
Semiconductor Inc. and pit that company's MIPS-based processor
architecture against Intel Corp.'s Xscale processors,
broadening an already fierce rivalry to the embedded front,
sources said. The acquisition will also position AMD against
other MIPS licensees, including Integrated Device Technology
Inc., NEC Corp., PMC-Sierra Inc., and Toshiba Corp. |
|
January 28, 2002
EE Times |
Advanced Micro Devices Inc., the No. 2 maker of
microprocessors that are the brains of personal computers, on
Monday released its highest-performing chip for laptop
computers as the company seeks to gain share in that market.
The Sunnyvale, California-based company said that its AMD
Athlon 4 processor 1500+ is available as of Monday for $525 in
lots of 1,000. Notebooks using the chip from No. 2 PC maker
Compaq Computer Corp. will be available on Monday. |
|
January 28, 2002
Semiconductor Business News |
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. today claimed it was now offering
the fastest microprocessor for notebook PCs with the rollout
of its mobile Athlon 4 processor 1500+. The new processor is
expected to be available soon in Presario 700 notebook systems
from Compaq Computer Corp., according to AMD.
The new processor's "1500+" designation indicates that the
chip has the applications performance equal to a 1.5-GHz
Pentium from rival Intel Corp. The Athlon 4 processor 1500+
actually has a core speed of 1.33 GHz. AMD introduced the new
model numbering system last fall to help users gauge
application speeds under its "True Performance Initiative." |
|
By Jack Robertson
January 25, 2002
EBN |
Intel Corp. ramped up low-end Celeron processor sales in the
fourth quarter to gain back some PC market share lost to AMD,
according to Dean McCarron, preisdent of Mercury Research,
Scottsdale, Ariz. Intel grabbed an 80.6% share of the PC
market compared with AMD's 18.5% share, he said. If Intel
processor sales for X-Box are included in the tally, Intel's
market share was 81.2%, compared to 18% for AMD, he told EBN. |
|
By Pee Kay
January 30, 2002
Bangkok Post |
I just bought a new PC specifically to play games and was
reminded me of something a good friend once said: the happiest
moment you will experience when buying a new PC is when you
sit down at the shop and watch the technician assemble your
machine. He insists that things only go downhill from this
point on _ and I couldn't agree more. A month after bringing
my new PC home, I still haven't solved all the problems. Since
most of the prolonged problems are related to heat (due to my
choice of an AMD Athlon CPU), it may be worthwhile if I share
the resolutions here. |
|
Truths...from the rumor mill |
|
By Mike Magee
January 25, 2002
The Inquirer |
WE HAVE BELIEVED and have written for maybe two years that
Intel is tirelessly working on its own version of X86-64
technology just in case two awful things happen - sales of its
Itanic processor don't get any better, and sales of AMD's
Hammer/Clawhammer ramp up alarmingly. We locate it in
Beaverton. See Intel steps up X86-64 skunkworks and Apology:
Intel's X86-64 skunkworks.
Now the Mercury News has picked up on this story and
amplified Intel's plans. |
|
By Andrew Orlowski
January 25, 2002
The Register |
A fine scoop by the San Jose Mercury apparently confirms the
existence of Intel's 64bit Plan B, codenamed Yamhill.
According the Merc, Yamhill adds 64bit instructions to the
existing x86 architecture, and may appear in the Prescott
chips, "with an option to turn the features on or off." The
emphasis is on 'may', as according to the former Yamhill
engineer, no decision has been taken to proceed with Plan B. |
|
By Mike Magee
January 29, 2002
The Inquirer |
SOURCES AT AMD confirmed what we earlier believed, and that is
there is no obstacle to Intel using the Hammer X86-64
instruction set if the chip giant wants to pursue a backup
plan. Sources close to AMD said that Transmeta "licensing"
the instruction set, which it did last May, meant no more than
it had decided to work with the instruction set and there were
no real conditions or limitations on use for X86-64 code. |