| March 5, 1999 |
|
By Mark Carroll
March 4, 1999
EE Times
|
A groundswell of support for the PC133
DRAM specification is building in Taiwan and the United
States. With Intel Corp. otherwise occupied with the
difficult transition to the Rambus memory architecture, a
growing number of memory and chip-set companies are
working to establish PC133 as an alternative to Rambus in
the marketplace. An ad hoc group of companies backing
the PC133 device and module specification is scheduled to
meet in San Jose, Calif. on Tuesday (March 9) to discuss
options. David Pulling, vice president of marketing at
Reliance Computer Corp. (San Jose) said "it started
out as monthly gatherings at our company, but now the
attendance has grown to the point that we are going to
move the venue to an outside location." About 120
representatives are expected to attend the meeting.
|
|
|
By Michael Kanellos
March 4, 1999
C/Net
|
Intel will hold a coming out party for
its first high-end Xeon processors based around the new
Pentium III on March 17 in an event that will feature,
among other technology demonstrations, servers running
eight processors. Xeon is Intel's answer for the
server and workstation market. Xeon chips are essentially
enhanced versions of the Pentium III chip found in
desktop computers.
|
|
|
By James Niccolai
March 4, 1999
InfoWorld Electric
|
At what point does a company become so
powerful that antitrust laws must be applied to regulate
its behavior? That question lies at the heart of the U.S.
Federal Trade Commission's antitrust case against Intel,
which is due to come to trial next week. Legal experts
say the conduct Intel is charged with -- that it coerced
companies into sharing technology patents by denying them
access to future microprocessors -- wouldn't be illegal
when practiced by a smaller, less powerful firm. But the
FTC will argue that Intel is a monopoly, and that it
exploited its power to snuff out competition and cement
its chokehold over the microprocessor market.
|
|
| March 4, 1999 |
|
By Warren Hersch
March 3, 1999
Computer Reseller News
|
Vendor adoption of the new CompactPCI
specification will significantly boost business
acceptance of computer-telephony technologies. That
was among the key messages of a keynote given by Natural
Microsystems chairman and CEO Robert Schechter, at
CTExpo.
"Fueling the CT market is the ongoing convergence
of voice and data technologies," said Schechter.
"But to realize the market's full potential, CT
vendors have to move aggressively to adopt open
standards. And that includes CompactPCI."
|
|
| The
Register Files |
|
By Mike Magee
March 4, 1999
The Register
|
Standing up bravely against threats and
dire Intel injunctions, corner shop Happy Cat in Hokkaido
tonight has posted benchmarks relating to the 810
chipset. Happy Cat attracted the ire of Intel by
posting pictures of previous products the chip Godzilla
has not yet announced.
Further down its pages, Happy Cat is still showing pix
of the i820 chipset which drew down threats from the
mammoth creature stalking the chip industry.
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 3, 1999
The Register
|
A metallurgical reader of The Register
has sent us facts and figures about different metals
Intel may be using in its cartridge Merced design. The
photographs, developed by Boots the Chemist in the St
Ann's Centre in Harrow, are here.
When we questioned Stephen Smith, who runs the Merced
programme in the US, he told us he had no metallurgical
knowledge and so therefore could not explain which metal
was on the backside of the cartridge.
|
|
|
March 3, 1999
The Register
|
This month, The Register was unanimous
about our Reader of the Month Award. The prize -- a
picture of Merced -- goes to Paul Engel, an investor in
Intel, who regularly writes about us on influential Web
site Silicon Investor.
The fact he writes about us means he reads us and we
award him high marks for partiality.
|
|
| March 3, 1999 |
|
By Martyn Williams
March 3, 1999
Newsbytes
|
Two senior executives from Intel Corp.
[NASDAQ:INTC] were among the eight foreign tourists
massacred in Uganda Tuesday, company officials have
confirmed to Newsbytes. Rob Haubner, Intel's director
of world-wide customer support, 48, and Susan Miller, a
senior tradeshow manager, 42, were on a vacation in
Uganda when, according to surviving members of their tour
party, they were kidnapped by Rwandan rebels.
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 2, 1999
The Register
|
At the Intel Developer Forum in Palm
Springs last week, Steve Smith, VP and general manager in
charge of the company's IA-64 programme, was pleasantly
forthcoming about the Merced package he showed us. He
even allowed us to take photographs, which we considered
was something of a breakthrough. What follows are the
verbatim notes from our discussion at the dinner table.
|
See More Stories in "The Register
Files" |
|
By Marcia Savage
March 3, 1999
Computer Reseller News
|
Intel and VA Research announced an
agreement to port the Linux operating system to Intel's
64-bit architecture. VA Research, in Mountain View,
Calif., will deliver the optimized port in mid-2000, the
same time as systems based on Intel's upcoming Merced
processor are available. Merced is the first chip in the
IA-64 architecture for high-end servers and workstations.
|
|
| Intel Anti-Trust Special Edition |
|
By James Niccolai
March 2, 1999
InfoWorld Electric
|
In court filings made public Monday, the
U.S. Federal Trade Commission enlarged its antitrust
complaint against Intel by charging that the chip maker's
actions stifled attempts by PC makers to differentiate
their products. Although the new allegation does not
expand the FTC's case to the extent some press reports
speculated it would, it provides the commission with one
more avenue by which to try and convince the
administrative law judge overseeing the case that Intel's
actions harmed competition.
|
|
|
By James Niccolai
March 2, 1999
PC World
|
Unlike Microsoft suit, squabbles about
the facts should be minor, and the government isn't
looking at expansion into other markets. When does a
company become so powerful that antitrust laws must
address some standard business practices? That question
lies at the heart of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's
antitrust case against Intel, which is due to come to
trial next week.
|
|
|
By Jack Robertson
March 3, 1999
Semiconductor Business News
|
The Federal Trade Commission has charged
Intel Corp. with "abusing its monopoly
position" to coerce competitors to cross-license
their technology on the most favorable terms to Intel. In
a pretrial brief, the FTC argued that "in effect,
Intel set up its own prviately-administered compulsory
licensing regime to acquire at reduced cost any
technology that it perceived to be a competitive
threat." The FTC said Intel forced Digital Equipment
Corp. and Compaq Computer Corp. to cross-license their
technology for competitive microprocessors and
motherboards. Intergraph Corp. was able to resist Intel
only because it gained a preliminary injunction in
federal court.
|
|
|
By Marcia Savage
March 2, 1999
Computer Reseller News
|
The Federal Trade Commission outlined
its case against Intel Corp., and the processor giant
presented its rebuttal to the government's antitrust
allegations in pretrial briefs. The briefs set the
stage for a March 9 showdown where an administrative law
judge here will begin hearing arguments from both Intel
and government lawyers to determine whether Intel is a
monopoly that unfairly used its market position to hurt
competition, as the government alleges. The FTC launched
its antitrust suit against Intel last June.
|
|
|
By Jack Robertson
March 3, 1999
Semiconductor Business News
|
Intel argued in a pretrial brief
released Tuesday that the government's own expert witness
admitted he could find no evidence that Intel had
"diminished innovation by industry" in
withholding proprietary data from Digital Equipment,
Compaq, and Intergraph. The brief quoted Frederic
Scherer, professor of corporate management at Harvard
University, in a deposition saying he "could not
find evidence" of any Intel conduct that "would
adversely affect the R&D expenditure or adversely
affect price competition" by any other companies in
the industry.
|
|
| The
Register Files |
|
March 3, 1999
The Register
|
NatSemi-Cyrix and Wyse have jointly
announced a WinCE based terminal using the MediaGX
processor. The announcement is the result of
collaboration started last June, with Wyse releasing its
Winterm 3350SE machine.
According to Wyse, the 3350SE thin client is its
highest performance machine.
|
|
|
March 3, 1999
The Register
|
Once again, Mike Magee represented The
Register at Intel's Developer Forum in the heart of a
desert. Here is some of the coverage... Pictures of
the Merced cartridge
Merced chieftain outlines futures
Intel's Flash presentation
Intel NDA found on floor
Lion roars because of Intel chip pricing
Intel decks more chips
Intel employee saves UK journalist's life
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 3, 1999
The Register
|
Web sites are reporting that supplies of
AMD's K6-III are extremely limited. According to the
CPU price check at Sharky Extreme, both the K6-III 450MHz
and K6-III 400MHz are not yet available in the US.
It quotes vendors as saying that they were told it
would be several weeks before supplies were assured.
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 3, 1999
The Register
|
Intel confirmed today that two of their
senior executives, Rob Haubner and Susan Miller, were
among eight tourists massacred by Rwandan rebels
yesterday. The two were married and were based in
Hillsboro, Oregon. Haubner was Intel's director of world
wide customer support and Miller was a senior tradeshow
manager.
|
|
| March 2, 1999 |
|
By Mike Magee
March 2, 1999
The Register
|
Sources close to HP's plans said today
that the company will release its chipset supporting the
Merced platform next month. For the time being at
least, HP will maintain its dual strategy of selling
HP/UX boxes at the high end and Windows NT servers at the
low end.
But the sources added that the long-term commitment is
to the IA-64 platform, with HP's roadmap, which stretches
five years ahead, consistently moving towards that goal.
|
See More Stories in "The Register
Files" |
|
March 1, 1999
Semiconductor Business News
|
Cyrix Corp. today announced that Wyse
Technology Inc. is offering its first Microsoft Windows
CE-based terminal built around Cyrix's integrated MediaGX
processor. Wyse and National Semiconductor Corp., the
parent company of Cyrix, banded together last June to
develop high-performance thin-client solutions that would
culminate in the "terminal-on-a-chip." The
Winterm 3350SE, the first product to come out of this
joint venture, incorporates other National chips,
including Super I/O, audio codec and several power
devices
|
|
More
Accusations Against Intel
Federal Trade Commission adds new point to
its claim that the company stifled competition.
By James Niccolai
March 1, 1999
PC World
|
In court filings made public Monday, the
U.S. Federal Trade Commission enlarged its antitrust
complaint against Intel by charging that the chip maker
stifled PC makers' attempts to differentiate their
products. The new allegation doesn't broadly expand the
FTC's case, as speculation had suggested, but it is one
more point the commission can offer to the administrative
law judge who is overseeing the case. The judge will
decide whether Intel's actions harmed competition.
The government made the new allegation in a pretrial
brief filed with the court last week. But Intel's
pretrial brief, also released Monday, claimed that even
the FTC's own expert economic witness found no evidence
that Intel reduced competition or harmed innovation in
the microprocessor market.
|
|
|
By Mary Mosquera
March 1, 1999
TechWeb
|
With the antitrust trial set to start on
March 9, the government and Intel Monday released dueling
pretrial briefs. The Federal Trade Commission's brief
charged that the chip maker pressured its partners to
turn over technology patents that could have encouraged
competition.
Intel's pretrial brief countered the FTC's claims of
an Intel monopoly and illegal business practices by
stating that competition and innovation in the
microprocessor market has accelerated since the
government began investigating the Santa Clara,
Calif.-based chip maker.
|
|
|
March 1, 1999
SiliconValley.com
|
The U.S. government Monday laid out its
charges against leading computer chip maker Intel Corp.
ahead of the start next week of the second big antitrust
case against a high-tech industry leader. In a 50-page
court filing, the Federal Trade Commission said Intel was
still abusing its monopoly power and repeated charges
that it had bullied three of its customers to maintain a
stranglehold on the market.
|
|
|
By Dan Goodin
March 1, 1999
C/Net
|
Even the FTC's top economist can't find
that Intel harmed innovation in the microprocessor
industry, the chip giant alleged in its pre-trial brief
filed today. Intel's brief, filed in advance of next
week's administrative trial at the Federal Trade
Commission, argues that the admission undermines the
agency's case that Intel is a monopolist that used its
intellectual property to stifle competition among
would-be competitors.
|
|
|
By John G. Spooner
March 1, 1999
PC Week Online
|
Intel Corp. will vigorously defend
itself against charges by the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission that it has used its leading market position
to limit innovation in the microprocessor market,
according to its pretrial brief. The brief, which
outlines Intel's defense, shows the company will come out
swinging at next week's hearing before FTC Administrative
Law Judge James Timony.
Filed under seal but released in a redacted version
Monday, Intel's brief outlines a strategy designed to
poke holes in the FTC's charges by, among other things,
using the depositions of the agency's own expert
witnesses.
|
|
|
By Jack Robertson
March 1, 1999
Electronic Buyers' News
|
Intel Corp. argued in a pretrial brief
released today that the government's own expert witness
admitted he could find no evidence that Intel had
"diminished innovation by industry" in
withholding proprietary data from Digital Equipment
Corp., Compaq Computers Corp., and Intergraph Corp. The
brief quoted Frederic Scherer, professor of corporate
management at Harvard University, in a deposition saying
that he "could not find evidence" of any Intel
conduct that "would adversely affect the R&D
expenditure or adversely affect price competition"
by any other companies in the industry.
|
|
| The
Register Files |
|
By Mike Magee
March 2, 1999
The Register
|
A reader sent us some interesting
information from a Japanese Web site and thoughtfully
translated it for us too. According to this
information, AMD will shift the manufacturing process of
the K6-III from 0.25 micron to 0.18 micron in the second
half of 1999, but has not yet decided whether to perform
that miracle on the K6-2, as yet.
|
|
|
By John Lettice
March 2, 1999
The Reigster
|
Intel has been running "its own
privately administered compulsory licensing regime,"
says the US Federal Trade Commission in pretrial
documentation released yesterday. The FTC is due to open
its antitrust case against the chip giant on 9 March, and
although its case is a lot tighter-looking than the rival
attraction, DoJ versus Microsoft, this one should run and
run as well. The FTC intends to argue that Intel is a
monopoly, and uses it power to extract patents and deals
from its partners. Spats between Intel and Compaq, DEC
and Intergraph (currently running its own antitrust
action against Intel) will be used in evidence will
figure prominently, and Intel's practice of cutting-off
access to technical data during disputes will be argued
over in some detail.
|
|
| March 1, 1999 |
|
By Eric C. Fleming
March 1, 1999
PC Week Online
|
Intel Corp. dropped 3 3/8 to 116 9/16 on
Monday after being downgraded to "market
perform" from "buy" at Donaldson Lufkin
& Jenrette, which also lowered its 1999 and 2000
earnings estimates. Intel's estimate for this year was
pared to $4.50 a share from $4.65 a share and 2000
expectations were lowered to $5.30 a share from $5.45 a
share by Charles Boucher, analyst at DLJ. The First Call
Corp. estimate of 32 analysts for 1999 is $4.70 a share,
and 27 analysts polled by First Call see earnings at
$5.50 a share in 2000 for Intel.
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 1, 1999
The Register
|
At the Intel Developer Forum, The
Register was asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement. We
never do so, partly for legal reasons and partly because
we believe journalists should not and need not sign NDAs.
We prefer to operate on trust and contacts and absolutely
hate burning our contracts. For example, if an Intel
representative said he or she trusted us not to publish
before a certain date, we might or might not do so. There
is another issue here. NDAs were invented by computer
companies so they could tell their partners and customers
something ahead of time. Journalists are neither partners
nor customers of Intel, nor of any other computer
company.
|
See More Stories in "The Register
Files" |
|
February 26, 1999
SiliconValley.com
|
Tarnishing the launch of Intel's newest
Pentium chips, a report Friday revealed that consumers
bought more computers in January with semiconductors made
by Advanced Micro Devices -- knocking Intel from the No.
1 spot for the first time. Shares of Intel slid $8, or
more than 6 percent, to $119 on Wall Street amid news
that 43.9 percent of all desktop PCs sold in January were
equipped with AMD-K6 processors, according to the
research firm PC Data.
|
|
|
By Robert Lemos
February 26, 1999
ZD Net News
|
Intel Corp. chairman Andy Grove likes to
say that only the paranoid survive. Judging from the
most recent numbers, though, being paranoid may not be
enough. According to a new study from PC Data,
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (NYSE:AMD) for the first time
outsold Intel (Nasdaq:INTC) in the chip retail market.
PC Data's study, which looks only at the U.S. retail
market and not at the market for direct or corporate PC
sales, shows that systems based on AMD's K6 processor
family accounted for 43.9 percent of unit sales in
January, with Intel-based systems accounting for 40.3
percent of sales.
|
|
|
By David Lammers
February 26, 1999
EE Times
|
Intel Corp. said its Merced processor
development effort has reached a significant milestone:
the running of the Unix operating system in a software
simulation of a four-way Merced implementation. The
successful interoperability of multiple logic models of
Merced opens the door for a full-scale push to finish the
physical implementation of Merced in time for sampling to
OEMs by the middle of this year, Gadi Singer, an Intel
vice president who co-manages the Merced development
effort, said at the Intel Developers Forum here.
|
|
|
By Ephraim Schwartz
February 27, 1999
InfoWorld Electric
|
Intel announced last week at its
Professional Developer's Conference in Palm Springs,
Calif., plans to ship manufacturing samples of its 64-bit
Merced processor in mid-1999, with the production version
following in mid-2000. The company also announced that
using a PC running the Merced simulator, it successfully
booted seven different operating systems, including
Microsoft's forthcoming Win64, Sun's Solaris, SCO's
UnixWare Monterey, Novell's Modesto, and
Hewlett-Packard's HP-UX. Intel also plans to fully
support a 64-bit version of Linux.
|
|
|
By Kristen Kenedy and Doug Olenick
February 26, 1999
TechWeb
|
AMD's efforts to claim a share of the
high-end retail PC market seem to be working. As systems
based on the K6III, AMD's new high-end CPU, go on sale in
stores this week, research shows AMD gaining ground in
PCs with price points above $1,000. Once strong only
in the sub-$1,000 market, where it held about a 50
percent share in January, AMD's cut of the
$1,000-to-$1,500 PC market grew from 33 percent in
November to 39 percent in January, according to PC Data,
in Reston, Va.
|
|
|
By Marcia Savage
February 26, 1999
Computer Reseller News
|
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Friday
introduced its fastest K6 2 processor and PC makers
introduced new systems based on AMD chips. The launch
of the 450MHz K6 2 was boosted by a report from a
market-research firm that showed Sunnyvale, Calif.-based
AMD surpassing Intel Corp. in retail market share.
|
|
|
By Will Wade
February 26, 1999
Semiconductor Business News
|
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. today
introduced its fastest K6-2 microprocessor, which is
expected to help to company solidify its lead in the
basic PC segment. One market research firm has now
reported that AMD is the dominant MPU vendor in the U.S.
retail market, with 44% of all sales. "This is a
major milestone for AMD," said Stephen Baker, senior
hardware analyst at PC Data Inc., a Reston, Va.-based
research firm. "This is the first time that a
processor family other than one manufactured by Intel led
the U.S. retail market."
|
|
|
By Will Wade
February 26, 1999
Semiconductor Business News
|
Intel Corp. today officially introduced
its much-covered Pentium III in a bid to lock in its
position as the dominant microprocessor vendor.
Recognizing that the Internet is now one of the main PC
drivers, Intel optimized the new chip for enhanced
graphics, especially the three-dimensional images used
over the World Wide Web. "The Pentium III
processor enables the most powerful personal computers
for running media rich in software, both on and off the
Internet, in the home and in business," said Mike
Aymar, vice president and director of Intel's platform
launch operation. The chip has 70 new instructions all
aimed to delivering better graphics capabilities,
although rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. has long
stated that its own 3DNow! Technology is at least the
equal of Intel's feature. The 3Dnow! Feature has been
available for nine months.
|
|
|
By Michael Kanellos
March 1, 1999
C/Net
|
The Pentium III processor went on sale
last week, and the one you may want to buy comes out in
September. While Intel's latest processor will improve
the quality of video, audio, and multimedia on PCs
through its new "SIMD" processor instructions,
some analysts and observers believe that the premier
benefit of upgrading to a Pentium III machine won't
appear for seven months.
By then, Intel will be shipping a new version of the
Pentium III, code-named Coppermine, which will run at 600
MHz and contain new architectural improvements that boost
performance.
|
|
|
By Kevin Railsback
February 27, 1999
InfoWorld Electric
|
With all of the marketing hype
surrounding Intel's Pentium III processor, it is tough to
know whether it will actually help your business. I
compared the performance of two typical business desktop
systems, from Compaq Computer and Hewlett-Packard,
testing with both Pentium II and Pentium III CPUs. Many
vendors are now, or soon will be, shipping business
desktop machines that include the new chip.
|
|
|
By Stephanie Miles and Brooke Crothers
March 1, 1999
C/Net
|
Toshiba, one of the largest notebook PC
suppliers in the United States, said today that it will
use chips from Advanced Micro Devices, a strong signal
that the chipmaker is making headway in the portable
computer market. On Friday, a a report said that
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) K6 family of desktop
processors outsold all Intel-based desktop PCs in the
U.S. retail market for the first time.
But the Toshiba deal provides further evidence that
AMD is also well on its way to taking a large chunk of
the retail notebook market. Compaq already uses AMD chips
in most of its Presario portables.
|
|
|
By Mary Lisbeth D'Amico
February 26, 1999
PC World
|
A German computer magazine's finding
that it could thwart the software utility program that
deactivates an ID feature of Intel's newest chip has
caused a stir amid Intel's marketing push for the Pentium
III. The latest spark is the Center for Democracy and
Technology's announcement that it will file a formal
complaint with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission charging
that the identification technology constitutes an unfair
and deceptive trade practice.
And some systems vendors say they'll disable the ID
feature in their new Pentium III systems.
|
|
|
By John G. Spooner
February 26, 1999
PC Week Online
|
Intel Corp. and the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission, in preparation for their court showdown,
filed pretrial briefs this week. Filed under seal, the
briefs outline how each side will present its case in a
hearing before FTC Administrative Law Judge James Timony.
The FTC filed an antitrust lawsuit against Intel last
June, claiming the Santa Clara, Calif., company used its
position in the market to unjustly influence Compaq
Computer Corp.(NYSE:CPQ) , Digital Equipment Corp. (now
part of Compaq) and Intergraph Corp.(Nasdaq:INGR)
|
|
|
By George Leopold
February 26, 1999
EE Times
|
The combatants in the government's
antitrust case against Intel are revving up their
public-relations machines as they prepare for the start
of a landmark Federal Trade Commission hearing next
month. Of those with the most at stake in the outcome
of the Intel case is workstation vendor Intergraph and
its down-home chairman Jim Meadlock. Meadlock, a
government witness in the antitrust case, is also
battling Intel in a federal court back in Alabama over
Intel's alleged infringement of its cache-management
patent.
|
|
| The
Register Files |
|
By Mike Magee
March 1, 1999
The Register
|
Executives at the Intel Corporation took
The Register for a bunny-suited tour of Fab 11 in
Albuquerque, New Mexico and made us sweat. But more on
perspiration later. From the outside, the plant looks
unexceptional, a two or in some places three story
building, but there are three floors below ground.
Security at the front of the building is relatively
tight. Employees and visitors have their bags examined as
they enter, and there are several guards posted at the
entrance. Most of the functions of the fab itself are
controlled from one room, but as far as we could tell,
this room does not have fail over. At the back of the
building, is a car park but we couldn't tell what
security was like there. One of our journalistic
colleagues on the tour said, that as far as he could
tell, there were no major back up systems in place for
electrical supply.
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 1, 1999
The Register
|
Executives at the Intel Corporation took
The Register for a bunny-suited tour of Fab 11 in
Albuquerque, New Mexico and made us sweat. But more on
perspiration later. According to representatives from
the company, it is extremely unusual for journalist to be
allowed into the clean room and while we weren't allowed
to dawdle, we were shown quite a lot.
First of all, we were shown the sub-fab area, the
plumbing, so to speak, of the fab. Down there in the
depths there are huge scrubbing machines that remove the
toxic waste, including hydrofluouric and hydrochloric
acid, from the process. Most of the water is purified and
returns to the system.
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 1, 1999
The Register
|
Executives at the Intel Corporation took
The Register for a bunny-suited tour of Fab 11 in
Albuquerque, New Mexico and made us sweat. But more on
perspiration later. Intel did not put us under a geas
(NDA) in our tour around the clean room but we weren't
allowed to loiter and forbidden to stray outside of the
yellow lines into the chases.
Gowning Up
We were told the night before that when we showered in
the morning, we had to wash off all traces of scented
soap and perfume. Women or men are not allowed to wear
make-up or fragrances of any kind.
|
|
|
By Mike Magee
March 1, 1999
The Register
|
Intel does not allow any cameras inside
its fab besides from its own for obvious reasons. We did
point out to them that these days you can get really good
cameras that will fit in your tie if you're wearing one,
but we didn't have one of those... Diffusion area
A technician carries a lot box of wafers down an
alleyway of diffusion surfaces. He or she is coming from
the photographic area (see colour at back). The furnaces
grow layers of oxide on the wafers and the oxide is then
etched using a pattern photographically imprinted on the
surface in a later step. See the robots on each of the
technician loading and unloading the furnaces.
|
|
|
By Graham Lea
March 1, 1999
The Register
|
In the Microsoft trial, Eric Engstrom is
being used to challenge the account of Microsoft's Intel
relationship, as told by Steve McGeady and Intel's
documents. Strangely, McGeady's name was never mentioned:
he has evidently become a non-person. An Intel
internal email from Gerald Holzhammer on 13 April 1995
summarised a face-to-face meeting with Engstrom, Carl
Stork and Marshall Brumer of Microsoft. He concluded that
Microsoft wanted to own the drivers in Windows 98; that
nobody but Microsoft was qualified to do good driver
software; that Microsoft would not collaborate on NSP;
and that Microsoft had "completely missed the
boat" on developing a compelling state of the art
media subsystem for Windows 95", according to a
confession by Carl Stork.
|
|
